blondelibrarian on books #2
10 May 2004 23:13 book wormI finished A Thousand Acres yesterday. Now, I know I promised a book review but after I thought about it, I remembered that I am not really very good at writing book reviews.
Actually, I find this kind of amusing since I majored in literature as an undergrad and have worked as a librarian for many years. But I really suck at writing book reviews. I can write a lovely plot summary or a deep essay comparing and contrasting A Thousand Acres with King Lear, but a simple book review, forget it!
I can’t write a book review for two reasons: 1.) In a fiction book review you really aren’t supposed to give away the ending and I always do and 2.) The thoughts I have while reading a book and the days afterwards aren’t really review-material. I tend to ask myself lots of questions about the plot, the characters, and their motives, and while trying to answer these questions, I also ponder what the books means to me, but I always find it difficult to form a solid opinion on a book that I want to share with others.
Of course I form an opinion on a book and can tell you what I personally thought about it, but in truth, I am reluctant to dump my recommendations on others. The fact is not everyone likes reading the same things that I do and because of this, whether they find a book worthy or not is a very personal decision.
Take the book Angela’s Ashes for example: This book won all sorts of awards in 1996, including the Pulitzer Prize and was on the New York Times Bestseller List. Many people considered it a “must read.” My well-meaning aunt bought it for me for Christmas and after I read the back of the book, it sat on my bookshelf until one day I was desperate for something to read. I read it in one sitting and my first reaction was, “Yuck. I really didn’t like this book.” And then, “So, what was the fuss all about?” Personally, I didn’t really even think the book was all that well-written. But who am I to tell someone else that this book isn’t worth reading? Obviously, other people have enjoyed it and thought it award-winning… but me, I sold it the first chance I got after I read it.
I have always been a member of the literature school that promotes reading what you want and thinking what you want about it. As far as A Thousand Acres goes, I enjoyed reading this complicated book full of plot twists and Shakespearean-style tragedy and if you enjoy that sort of thing, I would definitely recommend it. However, if you don’t, then I would say don’t read it. It’s all up to you.

12 May 2004 at 13:21
Hi Ren?,
I agree with you, people should read what they like and whatever suits their mental pursuit. I often find the recommended reading or award winning books are better suited to the “general” taste and not for specific types of readers. They are also very commercialised, i.e books which had been promoted either to help the specific genr? or specific group of young writers, to bring attention to specific popular area of of fiction (wars, politics etc) and so on.
I read “Bridget Jones Diary” which was really yucky. I thought it was undermining our intelligence or so clich?. Most people (men and women) raved about it but I didn’t like it. I also thought Arundathi Roy “God of Small Things was hyped up to unsuitable proportion.
But then again, I have always been into reading and have changed my taste over time or depending on the type of books and where I am reading (holidays, home etc), so I tend to have my own ways of picking books up or leaving them down. But others whom are new or have always relied of the general opinion may need more guidance and input…
I guess each is to their own.